makeup and how it works

[Unkclan]

terms werent contradicting to you when you agreed to play on my money

you're right i should of read them more clearly before and explained to you they were wrong. that is one me. either way yours and everyone elses understanding of make up is wrong and i think it needs to be addressed

[eichroll]

Dude UNK u r wrong. U have nothing to call your own until M/U is paid back. plain and simple. If u make 100$ 60 goes to tommy then 25 more goes to tommy for M/U. id prolly send him 90 totaljust to keep my staker happy

[Unkclan]

Dude UNK u r wrong. U have nothing to call your own until M/U is paid back. plain and simple. If u make 100$ 60 goes to tommy then 25 more goes to tommy for M/U. id prolly send him 90 totaljust to keep my staker happy

DUDE YOU'RE TOTALLY RIGHT WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF THIS BEFORE

/sarcasm

[tommy62278]

DUDE YOU'RE TOTALLY RIGHT WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF THIS BEFORE

/sarcasm

the way cookies and unkclan are doing the math is he made me 100. pays me 25$ then we split 60/40. i still make money but i make less. if i staked ppl like that all the time this site would continuously lose me money.

[tommy62278]

Dude UNK u r wrong. U have nothing to call your own until M/U is paid back. plain and simple. If u make 100$ 60 goes to tommy then 25 more goes to tommy for M/U. id prolly send him 90 totaljust to keep my staker happy

that is how i believe tha math should work

[tommy62278]

your terms are contradicting. there would be no split because there is -25 profit. total - is 21.43


therefore your argument is invalid. was waiting for you to say this.

NEXT

regardless of any of this thread, you agreed to terms. if you did not like the terms or found them "contradicting" you did not have to agree to the terms. nor did you have to take my money and play on it. you should have said i do not agree sir and i would like to discuss new terms, but no you said pls ship me some cash to play because im really jonesing and want to play. i will agree to anything but ill argue after the fact.

im not really trying to be a superdick here but thats basically what happened here. communication is key to any relationship. whether im right or wrong(obv i believe im right) this could have all been discussed beforehand and then i coulda decided i was not gonna pursue any further stakes with you.

at no time did i agree to a 50% buyout like cookies does, nor did i say we will take all profits from this stake and apply it towards makeup. when i stake someone more than once i of course want to recoup all my money but im not trying to not make any profits from a 2nd stake.

if any of you reading this feel the same way as unkclan does about makeup feel free to have your opinions but also know that i want nothing to do with staking you. i set the terms. i am the staker. you are not getting a gun put to your head and told accept the stake or die.

youre all your own person and all have mouths or in our cases keyboards. speak your opinions upfront. we either come to an agreement or we decide to go our separate ways.

[Unkclan]

regardless of any of this thread, you agreed to terms. if you did not like the terms or found them "contradicting" you did not have to agree to the terms. nor did you have to take my money and play on it. you should have said i do not agree sir and i would like to discuss new terms, but no you said pls ship me some cash to play because im really jonesing and want to play. i will agree to anything but ill argue after the fact.

im not really trying to be a superdick here but thats basically what happened here. communication is key to any relationship. whether im right or wrong(obv i believe im right) this could have all been discussed beforehand and then i coulda decided i was not gonna pursue any further stakes with you.

at no time did i agree to a 50% buyout like cookies does, nor did i say we will take all profits from this stake and apply it towards makeup. when i stake someone more than once i of course want to recoup all my money but im not trying to not make any profits from a 2nd stake.

if any of you reading this feel the same way as unkclan does about makeup feel free to have your opinions but also know that i want nothing to do with staking you. i set the terms. i am the staker. you are not getting a gun put to your head and told accept the stake or die.

youre all your own person and all have mouths or in our cases keyboards. speak your opinions upfront. we either come to an agreement or we decide to go our separate ways.

i should have read the terms more clearly. you are correct that is on me. if i did i would have explained make up to you then.
you are wrong about makeup just google it man.

Either way you were getting all $16.xx tonight, it was just of where you thought it went. if you are going to stake someone and are using a term, please make sure you understand it. you don't understand a term so now you feel like i wronged you, which i didn't

[eichroll]

Y would u not give your backer his cut then take the m/u out of urs? I mean hes giving you a roll to play and u burned a bridge over 16$? retarded IMO.

[tommy62278]

tell me how this makes sense to any of you? sorry to keep this going im just not understanding at all how this math is correct.

ok the cookies and unkclan way using 50/50 split

guy owes you 25$ he makes a 100$ profit on next stake. using their math he pays you 25$ leaving 75$ to split. 37.50 each. you collect 62.50 total and he is even

now my way same split

guy owes 25$ makes 100$ profit on next stake. do the 50/50 split each gaining 50$ then he pays you the 25$ he owes. you collect 75$ and he is even.

which way makes more sense to you as a staker? why would the profits 1st go to his makeup then you split the difference?

[Unkclan]

tell me how this makes sense to any of you? sorry to keep this going im just not understanding at all how this math is correct.

ok the cookies and unkclan way using 50/50 split

guy owes you 25$ he makes a 100$ profit on next stake. using their math he pays you 25$ leaving 75$ to split. 37.50 each. you collect 62.50 total and he is even

now my way same split

guy owes 25$ makes 100$ profit on next stake. do the 50/50 split each gaining 50$ then he pays you the 25$ he owes. you collect 75$ and he is even.

which way makes more sense to you as a staker? why would the profits 1st go to his makeup then you split the difference?

as a staker i'm sure you'd rather receive the $75 but that isn't how it works.
the stakee would rather it the other way obviously. the staker would only receive $62.50



just think before in staking terms people didn't use make up. instead they would have split 50/50 originally

and staker receive $50


people chose the middle ground which makes it fair