makeup and how it works

[tommy62278]

your terms are contradicting. there would be no split because there is -25 profit. total - is 21.43


therefore your argument is invalid. was waiting for you to say this.

NEXT

regardless of any of this thread, you agreed to terms. if you did not like the terms or found them "contradicting" you did not have to agree to the terms. nor did you have to take my money and play on it. you should have said i do not agree sir and i would like to discuss new terms, but no you said pls ship me some cash to play because im really jonesing and want to play. i will agree to anything but ill argue after the fact.

im not really trying to be a superdick here but thats basically what happened here. communication is key to any relationship. whether im right or wrong(obv i believe im right) this could have all been discussed beforehand and then i coulda decided i was not gonna pursue any further stakes with you.

at no time did i agree to a 50% buyout like cookies does, nor did i say we will take all profits from this stake and apply it towards makeup. when i stake someone more than once i of course want to recoup all my money but im not trying to not make any profits from a 2nd stake.

if any of you reading this feel the same way as unkclan does about makeup feel free to have your opinions but also know that i want nothing to do with staking you. i set the terms. i am the staker. you are not getting a gun put to your head and told accept the stake or die.

youre all your own person and all have mouths or in our cases keyboards. speak your opinions upfront. we either come to an agreement or we decide to go our separate ways.

[Unkclan]

regardless of any of this thread, you agreed to terms. if you did not like the terms or found them "contradicting" you did not have to agree to the terms. nor did you have to take my money and play on it. you should have said i do not agree sir and i would like to discuss new terms, but no you said pls ship me some cash to play because im really jonesing and want to play. i will agree to anything but ill argue after the fact.

im not really trying to be a superdick here but thats basically what happened here. communication is key to any relationship. whether im right or wrong(obv i believe im right) this could have all been discussed beforehand and then i coulda decided i was not gonna pursue any further stakes with you.

at no time did i agree to a 50% buyout like cookies does, nor did i say we will take all profits from this stake and apply it towards makeup. when i stake someone more than once i of course want to recoup all my money but im not trying to not make any profits from a 2nd stake.

if any of you reading this feel the same way as unkclan does about makeup feel free to have your opinions but also know that i want nothing to do with staking you. i set the terms. i am the staker. you are not getting a gun put to your head and told accept the stake or die.

youre all your own person and all have mouths or in our cases keyboards. speak your opinions upfront. we either come to an agreement or we decide to go our separate ways.

i should have read the terms more clearly. you are correct that is on me. if i did i would have explained make up to you then.
you are wrong about makeup just google it man.

Either way you were getting all $16.xx tonight, it was just of where you thought it went. if you are going to stake someone and are using a term, please make sure you understand it. you don't understand a term so now you feel like i wronged you, which i didn't

[eichroll]

Y would u not give your backer his cut then take the m/u out of urs? I mean hes giving you a roll to play and u burned a bridge over 16$? retarded IMO.

[Unkclan]

Y would u not give your backer his cut then take the m/u out of urs? I mean hes giving you a roll to play and u burned a bridge over 16$? retarded IMO.

it comes out of make up first. that is how the stake term is used. just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it wrong. look up the term then try to argue....

[eichroll]

M//U is out of ur pocket not his!!! plain and simple u never use total profits to M/U. that makes no sense. u owe 25 - 1.43. thats that

[Unkclan]

M//U is out of ur pocket not his!!! plain and simple u never use total profits to M/U. that makes no sense. u owe 25 - 1.43. thats that

Makeup - Red Figure in Poker

try again