Collusion?

[trubton444]

hahahahahaha, that what i do when i talk to lilg

[royalpat]

love it very funny post

[bigphatmike]

Prawney because every rule should always be enforced.

[azreal1]

Prawney because every rule should always be enforced.

what about when 2 rules contradict each other...what then

[Prawney]

Prawney because every rule should always be enforced.

Im really lost now. I dont even know what points your trying to make anymore. I never once said that his hand shouldnt have been killed. Not once. All i ever said was this isnt collusion.

The only thing that makes sense here is that if you finally cleared your mind and realise that it isnt collusion and that is why your now trying to argue different points so you dont have to just come out and say you were wrong and over-reacted.

[bigphatmike]

@prawney : all these little arguments are intertwined. and Yes, it was still a colluded hand. I was All in, and they discussed thier hands and thier strategy out loud after i already acted they were still left to act. I dont think the hand should be dead, even if i lost the hand. i think they should not be able to play client if they ca not follow the rules Ie every RULE should be enforced.

[Prawney]

@prawney : All these little arguments are intertwined. And yes, it was still a colluded hand. I was all in, and they discussed thier hands and thier strategy out loud after i already acted they were still left to act. I dont think the hand should be dead, even if i lost the hand. I think they should not be able to play client if they ca not follow the rules ie every rule should be enforced.

lolololololol

I mean you yourself said that gimme had the nuts for him so never folding. So him saying he would fold was obviously with intent to keep fury in the pot. Nothing to do with you. People are allowed to use talk at the table to entice action. So they werent discussing strategy. Gimme was using talk to get mrfury to stay in the hand. It had nothing to do with you being in the hand. They werent discussing their hands to strategise against you.

I really dont see how you dont get this. Especially given that you point all this out in your arguements but dont seem to be able to connect the dots in the right way. While at the same time ur trying ur hardest to connect the dots in the wrong way and show collusion

[bigphatmike]

If he wants Mrfury in the pot, it has everything to do with me because im STILL in the hand AND IM ALL IN, he kinda talked fury into coming in, decresing my chances of winning, thus TOTALLY affecting me. People are nto allowed to table talk about thier hands while in a pot to entice action UNLESS they are heads up. I really dont see how you dont get this.

[Prawney]

So we are agreed that mrfurys hand should be dead. So give him 2K pts back.

Him and gimme got a warning about what happened.

Case closed.

Oh and lol that because your all-in someone isnt allowed try maximise their profit.

You realise your arguing that they are colluding. Now you basically admit that gimme was saying that to get mrfury all in but are now arguing that this isnt allowed.

So you aknowledge gimme was using his talk to take pts of mrfury, when u originally said they were working together.

Make ur mind up man

[azreal1]

So we are agreed that mrfurys hand should be dead. So give him 2K pts back.

Him and gimme got a warning about what happened.

Case closed.

Oh and lol that because your all-in someone isnt allowed try maximise their profit.

You realise your arguing that they are colluding. Now you basically admit that gimme was saying that to get mrfury all in but are now arguing that this isnt allowed.

So you aknowledge gimme was using his talk to take pts of mrfury, when u originally said they were working together.

Make ur mind up man

stop being mean prawney its obvious he is about as smart as a 2X4 ure jut picking on him now

colluding against him in the forum i call for