Poker site of choice?

[Blackacecard]

I play on full tilt poker but sometimes it gives me an impression that is rigged in some way because some times i get an 1 in a million bad beat and then I fell like throwing my computer out the window, but let`s hope it it`s not rigged :P

[gtrippp]

I play on full tilt poker but sometimes it gives me an impression that is rigged in some way because some times i get an 1 in a million bad beat and then I fell like throwing my computer out the window, but let`s hope it it`s not rigged :P

u mean like when hands that are 80-90% favorites 2 win keep losing, over & over again? so far, that's been my experience at every online poker site that i've played on.

[0maxpower0]

u mean like when hands that are 80-90% favorites 2 win keep losing, over & over again? so far, that's been my experience at every online poker site that i've played on.

I feel ya there. I really think that the amount of hands that you play online, lends itself to bad beats. Youre not playing 40 hands an hour or so, in rush you can avg about 500 hands in an hour. With that many hands youre gonig to lose those 1-2-3 outer more often. BUt yea, i cant say that sometimes i dont think its rigged. forget hand value and all that; you ever noticed that the plyrs with more chips in MTT usually suck out on short stacks.... its almost like they want the short stacks to go out and enter more tournament tso they get more rake... i dont know. i feel ya, but if you can make money at it, then who cares. Its just means your making money with all odds against ya.

[gtrippp]

I feel ya there. I really think that the amount of hands that you play online, lends itself to bad beats. Youre not playing 40 hands an hour or so, in rush you can avg about 500 hands in an hour. With that many hands youre gonig to lose those 1-2-3 outer more often. BUt yea, i cant say that sometimes i dont think its rigged. forget hand value and all that; you ever noticed that the plyrs with more chips in MTT usually suck out on short stacks.... its almost like they want the short stacks to go out and enter more tournament tso they get more rake... i dont know. i feel ya, but if you can make money at it, then who cares. Its just means your making money with all odds against ya.

the big stack beating small stack theory would make sense, if it worked when i was big stack 2. even when i'm big stack, i still see 2 big a percentage of bad beats. and the more hands u play equals more bad beats u see IS true, but percentages are the same no matter how many hands are played. the fact that i am still playing shows that i agree w/ ur last statement 2. i sumhow manage 2 stay above water in spite of the unfair cards. it would just be so nice, tho, 2 be able 2 win sum serious $, which i would be doing if the cards weren't so screwed. i refuse 2 deposit $ on any site until things change or until i find a fair site. i win $ on freerolls, then build bankrolls w/ that $, until the site decides that i've won enuf & i suddenly go on an amazing string of bad of beats, & there goes my little bankroll. then, i start the madness all over again. thanks 4 replying. good luck!

[Zab]

Hey Black, but you forget about the times you put a bad beat on someone.

Even a 1 outter has a high enough % chance to happen SOMETIMES

[Hans Landa11]

I've played lots of other poker sites and I still think Full Tilt is the best when it comes to software and playability. When it comes to bad beats though it's a whole different story.

[gtrippp]

I've played lots of other poker sites and I still think Full Tilt is the best when it comes to software and playability. When it comes to bad beats though it's a whole different story.

i completely agree. i luv the format. i don't like the incredible amount of bad beats.

[Thirdi3]

i could understand u going out of your way 2 respond that way if i was just saying the same one thing over & over. if u read all of my posts again, u will see that each one answers a different question, altho sum of them do include a couple of the same things as other ones. i did not know that i was supposed 2 read every single post in this thread & then respond 2 all of them in one post. i would think that would be confusing & people would not know that i was responding 2 their questions. i am sorry, tho, i will try not 2 post 2 many replies anymore.

I did read all of your posts ^_^ I was saying that you could have responded like this

i completely agree. i luv the format. i don't like the incredible amount of bad beats.

just using this as an example ^_^

The reason I asked is just so there is less spam on the boards and it is easier to navigate.

edit: I can delete any posts you need me to, just PM me with which posts you would like deleted ^_^

[jimmyd1953]

i agree , good site, the worst of all sites for bad beats, there r artciles that ft is not random, if your ahead in chips, u will most probably beat a short stack

[KLIC32]

I would have to FTP casue ive won alot there and they payout direct deposit!