Whos the worst out of these two?

[Detroitjunky]

back in the day i played a $5 sng on pokerstars - i thought - what if my only move was AI? how would i fare? So I decided that any hand i played i went AI and AI only - but it was for good hands (K10 suited and up) - funny thing is I won the tourney - but believe me I will never do it again. i think the AI is better move than limp if its every hand you play

[Detroitjunky]

but to be fair it is my opinion that both options are BAD

[gametime74]

you can punish a limper by raising, amybe then he will fold..all iners all the time are my fav peeps, i love those guys i usually double up quickly with them..who's the worst, great question.lol

[tdeuel214]

Someone who goes all in every hand it ruins poker.

[Turtleboooy]

I would have to say limping because they catch funny shit

[MadAdo]

If someone didn't know how to fold the hand, it is really no matter the difference. Just taste of poker style.

[Swickster007]

I would say they both are rough to play against, but in the long run, neither will do so well. I'd rather play an all-inner than a limper.

[azreal1]

someone who goes all in every hand, less easy to ignore more easy to tilt u and disrupts the gameplay imo
at least with a limper ull still be in the tourney if he hits as u can fold post flop

[xStaxxed]

some one who limps every hand?
some one who goes all in everyhand?

just a random i want your opinion thread... i know which i think is worse both pretty bad though


A risk taker in my opinion is going to be a better player in my opinion rather than somebody who just limps in. At least an all inner realizes there hand strength relative to the table and pushes whereas a limper is just getting nickle and dimbed.

[CTAnon]

They're both pretty bad because consistently playing the same way will never make you a lot of money in these 2 cases.