-
back in the day i played a $5 sng on pokerstars - i thought - what if my only move was AI? how would i fare? So I decided that any hand i played i went AI and AI only - but it was for good hands (K10 suited and up) - funny thing is I won the tourney - but believe me I will never do it again. i think the AI is better move than limp if its every hand you play
-
but to be fair it is my opinion that both options are BAD
-
you can punish a limper by raising, amybe then he will fold..all iners all the time are my fav peeps, i love those guys i usually double up quickly with them..who's the worst, great question.lol
-
Someone who goes all in every hand it ruins poker.
-
I would have to say limping because they catch funny shit
-
If someone didn't know how to fold the hand, it is really no matter the difference. Just taste of poker style.
-
I would say they both are rough to play against, but in the long run, neither will do so well. I'd rather play an all-inner than a limper.
-
someone who goes all in every hand, less easy to ignore more easy to tilt u and disrupts the gameplay imo
at least with a limper ull still be in the tourney if he hits as u can fold post flop
-
some one who limps every hand?
some one who goes all in everyhand?
just a random i want your opinion thread... i know which i think is worse both pretty bad though
A risk taker in my opinion is going to be a better player in my opinion rather than somebody who just limps in. At least an all inner realizes there hand strength relative to the table and pushes whereas a limper is just getting nickle and dimbed.
-
They're both pretty bad because consistently playing the same way will never make you a lot of money in these 2 cases.