Quote Originally Posted by abwil2 View Post
Mrlova while i may disagree with your saying merge is not rigged for action. I agree with sample size needed to determine anything. until i have 10k sample size i will remain silent on my rigged for action statement.

Heres a kicker for ya tho isnt the rigged BJ on merge run off the same rng? I think we all agree with casinos online being rigged at a higher % then B&M
I can't believe you actually think it's rigged...The amount of players that think this is ridiculous. I don't think I've used this term to describe players on PO, but the ones that truly think it's rigged are donks. I said it, they are donks. If you can't understand how online poker works or how the caliber of players playing effect the game then you are nothing more then a losing casual player. Merge has been known for years to have the softest games. They have a player base that is very inexperienced and new to poker. These players call with shit, and sometimes they win. No one here can say they've never gotten lucky, no one here can say they never hit a lucky river card. They can't say those things because we've all gotten lucky, and we've all be unlucky. It's poker, it's not a "rigged" site, or a donks fault you lost. It's the cards, aces don't win every hand. Just like 2-7 doesn't lose every hand. If players can't understand that they will never win. Players need to study their game in order to get better, something 90% of users on here probably don't do. I preach it almost every day in chat, it would be nice to see at least a few start working towards improving their games instead of debating on how they got "merged"