makeup and how it works

[madjek]

shipping unkclan 13.08 to run a mix of micro sngs on bcp. stake will be 60/40+sb and m/u. current m/u is 25$ any profits if any after our split will go towards m/u. horse must post all post hands. also agrees to update br after each post. can move up once he has 10x BI for next lv. glgl

this is what he agreed to madjek. read carefully

Like i said in chat, unk should of read fine print, so technically you are correct tommy, but this would be like someone saying terms are 60/40 with sb, then stating that if you lose sb is to be paid within a week. So obv they don't understand sb here and a reg stakee would only look at the beginning "60/40 with sb" and agree, knowing and assuming stakee understands what sb is. Here you are callin something m/u which is a common term in staking and expecting something different, this is not makeup, this is pay me back out of your winnings if i stake you again, which is fine if thats what you want, but its not make up, so i understand unk's pt , but its there in print and he should of read it and brought up issue before agreeing, so i am with you, but you should research what mu is before using the term in future stakes, all i am saying.

[Unkclan]

Like i said in chat, unk should of read fine print, so technically you are correct tommy, but this would be like someone saying terms are 60/40 with sb, then stating that if you lose sb is to be paid within a week. So obv they don't understand sb here and a reg stakee would only look at the beginning "60/40 with sb" and agree, knowing and assuming stakee understands what sb is. Here you are callin something m/u which is a common term in staking and expecting something different, this is not makeup, this is pay me back out of your winnings if i stake you again, which is fine if thats what you want, but its not make up, so i understand unk's pt , but its there in print and he should of read it and brought up issue before agreeing, so i am with you, but you should research what mu is before using the term in future stakes, all i am saying.

yeah i should have read more carefully and your assumption is dead on.

either way those terms are contradicting and confusing as you don't split until make up is paid in first place so that sentence is invalid