Yeah I am warming 2 your analysis. Just difficult 2 believe he has a hand that beats me given that he checked. It's just difficult 2 try 2 understand some of these players. I mean if he is a good thinking player he has 2 know that I have a real hand.... or why would I bet the turn 2 set up a river shove. So assuming he is a good player i would reason he would not have A10 in that spot given the fact that a good player is not likely 2 play a hand like A10 in that spot becuase it is so easily dominated. Now on the flip side.... if I think he is a bad player..... which fwiw I did..... then I can imagine that he would call with weak Aces.... and I would also conclude that he would bet 2 pair on the river. I mean I really thought he was bad..... and he was..... and I also really thought that a 10 was definately in his kicker wheelhouse. But given the fact that he checked and I thought he was bad I bet. I think you would be surprised how many top regs on merge would bet there 2. In reality.... I think its semantics....... not really imo anything overtly right or wrong with checking/betting river. One of those rare spots where both options imo are about break even. Good analysis though Prawney.... I think you definitely turned a definite bet in my mind.... into prolly a check given the fact that if it is nearly break even... then i would have been in a lot better spot 2 have checked and kept my stack in a great spot. I took the higher variance line.... and as I continue 2 type I think I really do like a c/back on the river. HUH.
Results 1 to 10 of 33
Threaded View
-
08-25-2012, 03:32 PM #19