PokerOwned Madness Consolidated ideas

[gpahren]

Just need to make sure:
a) There's enough incentive for more people to sign up so they don't feel like they have to play 3 or 4 tournaments a day;
b) There's no disincentive to play later just because you finish high in the first game.

[rghy2]

Like others have mentioned, I also don't like the idea of player ratings determining the winner of each round. I don't even know if I like player ratings being the first tie breaker because the best players will already have a big advantage with the player ratings determining the seeding. I like player ratings determining the seeding, but maybe have the first tie breaker be whoever finished highest in the day. Also, if betting starts Monday, what is the cutoff for registering?

[Zab]

Like others have mentioned, I also don't like the idea of player ratings determining the winner of each round. I don't even know if I like player ratings being the first tie breaker because the best players will already have a big advantage with the player ratings determining the seeding. I like player ratings determining the seeding, but maybe have the first tie breaker be whoever finished highest in the day. Also, if betting starts Monday, what is the cutoff for registering?

Higher in the day is what player ratings does..

Think about it. If you finish #3 in a tournament with 30 players (lock) vs me who finishes #4 in a Carbon tournament with 80 players.

Who should advance? I should.. Bigger \ Harder field.. That's EXACTLY what the rating system is for

[gpahren]

Higher in the day is what player ratings does..

Think about it. If you finish #3 in a tournament with 30 players (lock) vs me who finishes #4 in a Carbon tournament with 80 players.

Who should advance? I should.. Bigger \ Harder field.. That's EXACTLY what the rating system is for

Agree 100%

[rghy2]

Agree 100%

I disagree for this promo, I should win. Instead of the total overall rating, I'm talking about whoever has the single highest finish as a tiebreaker. That keeps with the whole concept that one game can make or break you in the bracket.

[Zab]

I disagree for this promo, I should win. Instead of the total overall rating, I'm talking about whoever has the single highest finish as a tiebreaker. That keeps with the whole concept that one game can make or break you in the bracket.

Again.. If you finished #3 in a tournament with 30 people and I finish #4 in a tournament with 80.. You should advance?

I feel like a #4 finish should be a #3 finish if there are 50 MORE players (Hence the player ratings calculations)

[rivdee]

Higher in the day is what player ratings does..

Think about it. If you finish #3 in a tournament with 30 players (lock) vs me who finishes #4 in a Carbon tournament with 80 players.

Who should advance? I should.. Bigger \ Harder field.. That's EXACTLY what the rating system is for

As a tiebreaker. Honestly, it's too bad we can't have an opt-in for the players so that they both consent to one tournament that day.

[Zab]

We've begun coding this...

[rivdee]

We've begun coding this...

Hell fucking yeah. Do I get a finder's fee pts wise for giving you the patent

[MIGO14]

well np, if its not possible atm, then maybe later...