Quote Originally Posted by crypiter View Post
I know the main issue right now is people not signing up so this suggestion is obviously secondary to that. I think that it should be player rating for at least 1 game that decides winners of each match and that's it. No heads up winning. This would allow better skilled players to rely on skill vs getting knocked out with your AA vs 23 off and some nit wins that game. Poker involves too much luck (much more than basketball obviously) and therefore it doesn't make sense to me to even have the option of losing because 1 game on 1 day someone lasted longer than you.

Sure in the NCAA bracket you can have an underdog win over a power team but that game itself is not decided on luck (SOME luck may play into it but very minimal). The underdog team PLAYED BETTER than the power team so they won. Right now in PO Madness you could be the worst player on the site and still win the championship every week bc the better player kept getting bad beated out of the tourney. I'm sure I'll be the only one supporting this idea but that's ok I still think it's the better way to decide daily winners.
If it changed to player rating I would never join it again, because the ratings are skewed towards the sites with fewer players and I can't play on ACP/BCP. I actually feel it should be changed to highest finish instead of player rating because I've lost because of that, it looked like the other player was avoiding getting into a headsup match with me. I think more people will start registering now that the numbers are going back up up. I like it being a 100 pt buyin. I would probably still register if it was less, but I wouldn't pay attention cause it wouldn't be enough points to matter to me.