Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,323

BTC Rate: $9821.41

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1
    Survey Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,925

    makeup and how it works

    recently i staked a player who owed 25$ makeup to me for previous stakes. i shipped him 13.08 to run some sngs on the bcp network. he turns the 13.08 into 16.65. ok the stake was a 60/40 cut with sb and m/u if he loses again. so my thinking is he made 16.65. so 16.65-13.08=3.57 left profit. take the 3.57x.6 for my cut on stake = 2.14. leaves 1.43 for his cut which goes towards make up???? sound correct?

    his opinion is i get my 13.08 back and all the profit thats left 3.57 goes towards make up? how would this be fair?? i make no profit on new stake? dont sound right at all to me.


    opinions pls

  2. #2
    Elite PokerOwned Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    737
    need opinions

  3. #3
    PokerOwned Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    188
    Hmmm i think i would have to side with tommy on that

  4. #4
    Survey Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,925
    Quote Originally Posted by JKoFF View Post
    Hmmm i think i would have to side with tommy on that
    ty i believe im right here also.

  5. #5
    PokerOwned Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    334
    Should have the 1.43 go back to tommy, and that be subtracted out of the 25 thats owed for make up.

  6. #6
    PokerOwned Pro eichroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    244
    Im with tommy on this if a player has staked u for 25 u lost it and he gives u another 13 u should b paying s/b until 38 is reached (rounded numbers). I mean I would atleast. If your going to hook me up to play on your behalf im in debt until i pay u back or I would give u 25 stake on diff site. I think its just a matter of staking people you trust. if i gave u 25 on other site to do as u wish with then i would keep 1.45 or whatever it was. I think moral of the lesson is only stake with people you trust and be very exact on repayment methods.

  7. #7
    Elite PokerOwned Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    737
    Quote Originally Posted by eichroll View Post
    Im with tommy on this if a player has staked u for 25 u lost it and he gives u another 13 u should b paying s/b until 38 is reached (rounded numbers). I mean I would atleast. If your going to hook me up to play on your behalf im in debt until i pay u back or I would give u 25 stake on diff site. I think its just a matter of staking people you trust. if i gave u 25 on other site to do as u wish with then i would keep 1.45 or whatever it was. I think moral of the lesson is only stake with people you trust and be very exact on repayment methods.
    you understand make up correctly. you are on my side you just don't know it.

    You are correct until i reach 38, there is no profit and i keep nothing

  8. #8
    Elite PokerOwned Member snklzona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    600
    In all of the stakes I have heard of or about dealing with m/u and s/b there could be only one correct method of doing this...that being precisely the way that tommy62278 laid it out in the first thread...

  9. #9
    Elite PokerOwned Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    737
    just another point for everyone.

    say i turned that 13 into 75

    62 profit x.4= 24.80


    so according to you guys that 24.8 would go towards make up.

    so i'd still have $.20 of make up


    Meanwhile Tommy would have (62-25) 37 total profit.

    Interesting.....

  10. #10
    Elite PokerOwned Member snklzona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by Unkclan View Post
    you understand make up correctly. you are on my side you just don't know it.

    You are correct until i reach 38, there is no profit and i keep nothing
    How do you figure there would be no profit from an entirely new/different stake...the new stakes obligation to pay past debt would not supercede the contactrual obligation of the second agreement...it would merely provide the means to do so...IMO...I'm just saying
    Last edited by snklzona; 06-06-2013 at 12:55 AM.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •