makeup and how it works

[SendCookies]

OK if a backer is staking for M/U then all profit goes toward M/U. If stakes are for different sites and staker wants them separate, then they must be treated as such.

The whole reason for staking a horse in M/U is so the staker will get his M/U back at full value. Otherwise it can be 'bought' out at a % of the value, normally 50%

This is general rules to staking, and is standard practice.

K guys. Hope this helps.

[Unkclan]

ok if a backer is staking for m/u then all profit goes toward m/u. If stakes are for different sites and staker wants them separate, then they must be treated as such.

The whole reason for staking a horse in m/u is so the staker will get his m/u back at full value. Otherwise it can be 'bought' out at a % of the value, normally 50%

this is general rules to staking, and is standard practice.

K guys. Hope this helps.

listen to the cookies

[tommy62278]

if i stake a guy 2 10$ tourneys. he loses. he owes 20$ now according to makeup. now i stake him in 1 more tourney a week later for 10$ he is putting up 0$ in this venture. now he owes 30$ on that i agree, but he cashes in this 3rd tourney for 50$ lets say. and its 60/40 agreement. he owes 20$ on a previous stake. 50$-10$ leaves 40$ i should get 60% =24$ and the 16$ left his % should go towards makeup owed.

why should all his future stakes count as 1 stake? or 1 continuous run? if thats the case why stake him again at all? im really not making a profit just using all the profits towards makeup. makes no sense for me to keep risking money on a guy. he plays with 0 risk and digs himself out of a hole while all i do is break even. nah im good on that.

[Unkclan]

if i stake a guy 2 10$ tourneys. he loses. he owes 20$ now according to makeup. now i stake him in 1 more tourney a week later for 10$ he is putting up 0$ in this venture. now he owes 30$ on that i agree, but he cashes in this 3rd tourney for 50$ lets say. and its 60/40 agreement. he owes 20$ on a previous stake. 50$-10$ leaves 40$ i should get 60% =24$ and the 16$ left his % should go towards makeup owed.

why should all his future stakes count as 1 stake? or 1 continuous run? if thats the case why stake him again at all? im really not making a profit just using all the profits towards makeup. makes no sense for me to keep risking money on a guy. he plays with 0 risk and digs himself out of a hole while all i do is break even. nah im good on that.

so you can make up the 20 you lost and hopefully make more profit.

why would i want to be staked again if overall i am profiting but still owe you

[Invertedafro]

I will certainly be clearing it on both sides before doing either...some good pts in there

[SendCookies]

I really don't know why you all are arguing the point. Just go to P2P and find out how m/u is suppose to work and move on.

[PokeYourFace]

yea, i think make up needs to be paid first, if make up was agreed upon. I think the 60/40 split should be done first b4 make up is paid. if i keep staking a horse who is not making me money, they should gladly play "free" games for me imo, til make up is paid.

i have never staked or been staked with make up b4, BUT if i was staker i'd feel like tommy does. if i was the make up owing horse i wouldnt even complain.

This is just how i'd feel as a staker, but im pretty sure cookies knows best... in general... usually.... kinda... sorta... maybe

[tommy62278]

this is the stake agreement between me and unkclan. you can go to the thread in marketplace and see that he agreed to this also.

shipping unkclan 13.08 to run a mix of micro sngs on bcp. stake will be 60/40+sb and m/u. current m/u is 25$ any profits if any after our split will go towards m/u. horse must post all post hands. also agrees to update br after each post. can move up once he has 10x BI for next lv. glgl

notice that right after i say his current m/u it says and i quote " ANY PROFITS IF ANY AFTER OUR SPLIT WILL GO TOWARDS M/U" case closed. you made an agreement and started this argument over nothing.

i am correct

[Unkclan]

this is the stake agreement between me and unkclan. you can go to the thread in marketplace and see that he agreed to this also.

shipping unkclan 13.08 to run a mix of micro sngs on bcp. stake will be 60/40+sb and m/u. current m/u is 25$ any profits if any after our split will go towards m/u. horse must post all post hands. also agrees to update br after each post. can move up once he has 10x BI for next lv. glgl

notice that right after i say his current m/u it says and i quote " ANY PROFITS IF ANY AFTER OUR SPLIT WILL GO TOWARDS M/U" case closed. you made an agreement and started this argument over nothing.

i am correct

your terms are contradicting. there would be no split because there is -25 profit. total - is 21.43


therefore your argument is invalid. was waiting for you to say this.

NEXT

[tommy62278]

your terms are contradicting. there would be no split because there is -25 profit. total - is 21.43


therefore your argument is invalid. was waiting for you to say this.

NEXT

terms werent contradicting to you when you agreed to play on my money