Printable View
What I'd like to see (In a perfect world)
Drop Juicy
Drop Lock (I didn't renew them last month)
Drop PokerStars
Add more BCP (Early game?) This will give us 4 BCP games
Keep Bovada the same
Keep Carbon the same
The only way I can do this is if BCP gets me the results same day \ real time (Working on that with them)
Oh no Zab !
Do not drop Pokerstars, keep it please and let get on FTP as well.
Either another BCP or Bovada would be awesome.
very very very little value there for me.. I lose money on PStars games every monthQuote:
Originally Posted by ProBlackbird
I wish we could track bovada results, this makes it so much less attractive for meQuote:
Originally Posted by rivdee
Dropping Lock I see no problem with. As far as Juicy, the numbers just haven't been there. I would love to see another earlier BCP (hint hint I miss the 2:30.) Adding another Bovada wouldn't be bad I don't think.
"I wish we could track bovada results, this makes it so much less attractive for me"
Scratch that then.
very nice.....maybe add another bovada.......
If you could get BCP to be tracked like carbon is, would it overtake carbon as like the main 4?
I guess is not all that bad having more BCP tournaments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind4green
Probably be equal to it.. Could add it to the grinder challenge, B2B, PO Madness etc
yeah that sounds good to me dropping juicy and stars. another bcp, maybe an early one and/or a bovada would n cool. I really want to play on bovada but because of the time I'm never able to make the one we have now. thanks zab, looking forward to it
I like playing at BCP, Bovada, and carbon the best. I have cashed out on all three with no problem. To me that is the main thing.
juicy stakes pays out now, keep juicy
keeping up with the trends of who pays out is whats best
KEEP PokerStars !!!! ADD FullTilt !! they have P2P .. lower Deposit/Withdrawl limits .
Carbon will be useless to me come Jan 1st .. No P2P ... No check/gift card ,, No Skrill .. only a Bank Transfer @ $500.00 min + Fees !
Bovada .. No Comment because I can't seem to be able to download it.
BCP .. more of these would be good ( unless they follow Carbon and remove Skrill on Jan 1st )
Lock .. dont care .. not much traffic it seems
Juicy .. yeah the numbers my be low but they do offer Skrill and P2P
Key Note : the P2P is VITAL !! It's my main source for points since I am NOT american
i wouldnt mind seeing an early game at BCP (omaha hi-lo would be killer - think it would help the players to be more well-rounded) and most definitely take out lock and juicy (juicy games are only like 12-20 players).
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBadJohn
where did u get these carbon results from!???? i know they quit the P2P, but it is only 50.00 min to withdrawal and they just added a bank withdrawal option.
I'm rooting for another Bovada.
I never play BCP or Juicy since they don't have mac software.
I actually had fun playing Lock and would play those again, but I completely understand avoiding them.
My Two Cents...Quote:
Originally Posted by Zab
Why do you want to drop Juicy now that it has become one of the more reliable cashout sites? Its possible more people would play (if that is your concern) if people were more aware of Juicy. They have better structured tournaments, and more cash games than BCP. I think you should at least keep one game. (also note that while they have a stated $100 cashout fee, if you have raked $25 and email support, they will waive $100 fee)
Bovada would be the best choice for the players (since it is currently the best option for US Players in terms of software reliability, MTTs participation) but it hurts the promotions that the results can not be tracked back to the site.
I guess increasing BCP is in the best interest of the site, although the terrible management of the network is making this a less desirable place to play as every single day passes. All too frequent site downtime, all too long software below par because they do not upgrade (and when they do it messes everything up), players asking for more than a year since new management came on to improve software just to minimally acceptable standards.
Put me down as voting to keep Juicy Stakes. BCP useless to me as they don't accept players from Washington state.
I think it hast to do with alot of players here not wanting to play there because they stopped p2p transfers. For some reason that is make or break with alot of ppl regardless of the cash out times or software.Quote:
Originally Posted by WECpoker
a $100 cash out fee is brutal imo, I wonder if they will routinely waive it as long as you continue to rake?
I like having more BCP or Bovada or Carbon. Just don't play at Juicy much anymore, and of course, never at PS, being from the US.
I think The plan you have going forward (with me, an unsure about Juicy yes or no) sounds good. Only one thing I would like to see esp. If we do have even more games at BCP is some more variety of game types like:
1-2 daily of the NLHE played either turbo or 6 man
Weekends having a game between 9-midnight (selfish reason for time :)) of PLO8 and HORSE (if BCP has HORSE, I know their s/w is capable of HOSE given they have stud, if neither, then Stud or Stud h/l instead of HORSE) would be awesome (wouldn't do more then 1 of each a day max, Sat and Sun gives a total of 4 of those extra variety games)
One of the things that's overlooked here is that the more tournaments we have on sites that offer p2p, the more the PO economy makes (if it can be traded, someone will buy it). No reason to drop juicy at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by s810car
Also, the grinder promotion was just reworked to account for the fact that we no longer have the lock fr - anything zab does here is gonna have implications on the progressive promotions.
That being said, has there been any thought to dropping a carbon and replacing it with a big ass BCP one? If you have a $35 BCP tournament the players here will go apeshit, and a lot of that money will flow back into the economy here via trade. We keep talking about getting rid of a tournament but I havent even seen this considered in this thread.
Being I work during the days, at most I get to see 2 Carbon games, if I'm lucky, while the BCP games are more frequent for me. I'd rather not drop A Carbon, and instead of adding 4 BCPs , maybe 1 normal and 1 large one? I'm actually all for dropping Bovada entirely, but that's biased due to the garbage anon table setup. As far as Juicy (this is once I get my issue fixed), I did like CPN back in the day so will be trying it if it stays, and if good still that's one more regular at the night game, and p2p is still critical to keep as many sites allowing this as possible imo.
Still voting for expanded variety :p but +1 on a daily large pool BCP