Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,439

BTC Rate: $63572.89

Points:

200

(See history)
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38
  1. 09-15-2012, 01:01 PM #21
    Swittie
    Swittie is offline
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by PooffyFooffy View Post
    you are wrong. They are much more profitable for me since I learned how to play them.
    Ssuglia is right, if you are losing with AA or KK over a large sample size, the problem is not the hand.
    its just a matter of luck.... i dont believe in this poker "dogmas"........


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-15-2012, 01:28 PM #22
    JoeSchmo
    JoeSchmo is offline
    PokerOwned Demi-God
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    971
    Ok, so u lost w/em with em 7 times, how many times did u have em?
    Last edited by JoeSchmo; 09-15-2012 at 01:51 PM.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-15-2012, 01:36 PM #23
    wwwrungood
    wwwrungood is offline
    PokerOwned Demi-God
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,378
    How is not possible to play Kings wrong? There is something called overplaying or underplaying them. And in poker thats that difference between how good you play them and making mistakes with them.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-15-2012, 02:08 PM #24
    greengiant
    greengiant is offline
    PokerOwned God greengiant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,591
    Damn 7 times that happens sometimes. I used to lose with KK everyhand but haven't had that bad luck in awhile. I hope your AA is holding up nowadays mann. GL at the felt.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-15-2012, 03:58 PM #25
    abenz419
    abenz419 is offline
    PokerOwned Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    204
    yeah... your not gonna win 100% of the time with pocket aces, the best you can try to do is maximize profits when your ahead, and minimize damage when your behind
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-15-2012, 06:07 PM #26
    AcesUp1439
    AcesUp1439 is offline
    PokerOwned Demi-God AcesUp1439's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,205
    Send a message via Yahoo to AcesUp1439
    You need to quit slow playing Aces. If you slow play Aces you will lose 9 out of 10 times. Shove preflop is the best way to play Aces.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-15-2012, 08:26 PM #27
    Swittie
    Swittie is offline
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeSchmo View Post
    Ok, so u lost w/em with em 7 times, how many times did u have em?
    9......=(


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-15-2012, 08:28 PM #28
    Swittie
    Swittie is offline
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by AcesUp1439 View Post
    You need to quit slow playing Aces. If you slow play Aces you will lose 9 out of 10 times. Shove preflop is the best way to play Aces.
    i tried that too....but always that i shove with them....some tard got set....=PP...............=(


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-15-2012, 08:31 PM #29
    JoeSchmo
    JoeSchmo is offline
    PokerOwned Demi-God
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Swittie View Post
    9......=(
    yeah, definitely sounz like you need to reevaluate how ur playing em. they shouldnt be losing anywhere near that percentage. i was just checin my HM data n mine r winnin right around 97%.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-15-2012, 11:40 PM #30
    Swittie
    Swittie is offline
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeSchmo View Post
    yeah, definitely sounz like you need to reevaluate how ur playing em. they shouldnt be losing anywhere near that percentage. i was just checin my HM data n mine r winnin right around 97%.
    then it was the day for me to hit ALL the bad percentage.......=/............=(


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules