LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksI lose with aa all the time and kk.
Results 11 to 20 of 38
Thread: AA eternal loser!!!
-
09-15-2012, 12:11 AM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 2
-
09-15-2012, 06:22 AM #12PokerOwned Demi-God
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 811
There is absolutely such a thing as playing a hand wrong.
Originally Posted by Swittie
Losing with AA a few times in a row? That's part of poker. I've seen players lose 20+ times in a row holding AA.
If you are losing with AA more than you should over a large sample size, then yes you are playing them wrong in certain situations.
20:52 <onehotdame> sug ...your the most helpful of Mods
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
-
09-15-2012, 08:15 AM #13PokerOwned God
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 2,492
they dont win in merge tho in real poker at tables it is a shoe in mostly
-
09-15-2012, 08:55 AM #14Experienced Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 34
90% i win with AA.
-
09-15-2012, 10:18 AM #15PokerOwned Demi-God
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 811
I win regularly with AA at Merge. The question is : What are you doing wrong that you're not winning with them more? Originally Posted by royalpat
20:52 <onehotdame> sug ...your the most helpful of Mods
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
-
09-15-2012, 10:41 AM #16PokerOwned God
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 1,789
really? Originally Posted by ssuglia
=PP
In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
-
09-15-2012, 12:01 PM #17PokerOwned God
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,677
How many times did you win with them? If you can't win with AA then maybe you should just quit playing.
-
09-15-2012, 12:04 PM #18PokerOwned Admin
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 4,136
you are wrong. They are much more profitable for me since I learned how to play them. Originally Posted by Swittie
Ssuglia is right, if you are losing with AA or KK over a large sample size, the problem is not the hand.Last edited by Poof; 09-15-2012 at 12:06 PM.
-
09-15-2012, 12:55 PM #19PokerOwned God
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 1,969
Tere is no worng way to play AA other than to not bet them and lose value. The professor likes getting as many people in as possible which means when he hits his set, nut flush etc he will make wayyyyyy more money then if he bets big pre flop and chases all but one away. That being said - yes u will win more HU but win less money. So there really isnt a proper way to play them unless weird circumstnces come up like ur short stacked as shet and near the bubble or other. comes down to style/preferance in a normal situation. Go big go HU or slow play them (still betting but smaller) and try to win a huge pot. Odds are with you either wayyyyyy - ur ahead pf.
-
09-15-2012, 12:58 PM #20PokerOwned God
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 1,969
One other thing abour slow playing thm AA's - if your good u can tell when their beat and fold ur 1 pair. i.e. flop and turn are not ur suit and ur into an all in turn bet - u might call if ur a red neck. If the board is 789 10 - and u face a huge over the top bet - yes u may call with 1 pair if ur a red kneck etc... Playing huge bets fast takes that way from you. some tourneys are call station tourneys and it makes sense to take a look with half ur stack instead of all of it.
Reply With Quote