Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,439

BTC Rate: $66593.05

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46
  1. #11
    PokerOwned Master Prozach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    345
    I think this is one of the worst ideas on this forum. Leave b2b!
    You check, I bet. You raise, I re-raise. You go all-in, I fold.
    "Ya prozach makes a good point" - Zab

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    319
    ok i agree with all scrap the 150 cap lets do a 50 freeroll but can we make this at the 7pm game would be perfect time i think

  3. #13
    PokerOwned Admin Poof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Prozach View Post
    I think this is one of the worst ideas on this forum. Leave b2b!
    lmao, it was your idea....

  4. #14
    PokerOwned God rrickir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,207
    u guys are sillyyy we can have a 50 doolla freolll, and i think zab said still keep b2b at 50 dolllars too AND u know it will keep growing TOOO,, so ho w is that a bad deal???LOL its a niceee offfer

  5. #15
    PokerOwned Master Prozach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    345
    I think up a lot of ideas.... Not saying they are all good.
    You check, I bet. You raise, I re-raise. You go all-in, I fold.
    "Ya prozach makes a good point" - Zab

  6. #16
    PokerOwned God
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,435
    rrickir go away :P haha jk

    #NiggasInParis

  7. #17
    PokerOwned God Prawney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,158
    This is terrible idea imo. Everyone has been buzzing about the B2B possibly getting to $100 and now when it gets there to just cut it in half doesnt make sense. I understand this is a freeroll site and the oppurtunity of a free tourney with double the normal prizepool is a tasty looking prospect, but i think it totally devalue's the B2B.

    While i think taking funds out of the B2B prizepool for any reason other than someone winning it a horrendous idea, atleast higher the cap to atleast $150 so if you take the $50 out theres still a buzz about it.

    Dont think there should be a cap on the B2B at all but i suspect to be the lone voice here.

    I remember how everyone was all for the 1500 starting stack until they got it and now everyone wants the 2000 back. I got a feeling if this goes ahead people (especially those who dont cash/cant play) will feel like it was the wrong decision also

  8. #18
    PokerOwned God Prawney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,158
    Btw has anyone ever seen a casino/ online poker site run a freeroll when their Bad Beat Jackpot isnt won for awhile.... Nope of course they dont. The bigger the prize to more exciting.

    Man im actually getting pretty worked up over this.

  9. #19
    PokerOwned Master Prozach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    345
    I agree with Prawney, we should take half the b2b and make a $50 FR.
    You check, I bet. You raise, I re-raise. You go all-in, I fold.
    "Ya prozach makes a good point" - Zab

  10. #20
    Seasoned Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    57
    I think the 150 cap is a good idea if you decide to do a $50 freeroll. I'm up for leaving the b2b alone and let it keep rising.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •